Maybe because the headline is misleading? (because there's no connection to the Hugging Face attack)

That said, it's the second day and it's still on the front page.

The headline is not misleading, the article actually links to the incident with OpenAI and Irregular which is here: https://openai.com/index/third-party-cyber-evaluations-invol...

glenstein 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Maybe the title was changed, but the current title does not reference a Hugging Face attack.

	▲	Ydarbleoj 7 hours ago \| parent [-]
		After reading the article, the title doesn't seem all that off and definitely nothing to be a pedant about.

an0malous 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Which part of the headline is misleading? It is factually correct that Irregular was involved in incidents with all three AI labs.

It must have been reinstated because it was off the front page for a full day and suddenly back up in the last hour.

	▲	cubefox 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		It is strongly misleading because it says "behind hacking scandals" (which suggests behind all of them in general) not "behind some of the hacking scandals". Considering that by far the most important one, the Hugging Face hack, has no Irregular involvement, the headline is deceptive.