| |
| ▲ | Terr_ 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > difficult to know which brands are still actually quality anymore I haven't verified its accuracy, but I had a tab open for this from HN a while back: > The Brand Ledger tracks 397 brands, from the tools in your garage to the pans in your kitchen. Who owns them, what they used to be, whether they're still worth buying. https://ledger.worseonpurpose.com/ | | |
| ▲ | hn_acc1 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Yeah, not sure I would rely on that.. Sure, they have Knipex and Klein on the approved list (which, AFAIK, is true), but then they list Warby Parker (read reddit - has gone WAY downhill), Cutco (by all accounts, a total rip-off and super low-quality knives requiring you to constantly get them sharpened) and Henkels, which also makes some pretty suspect knives, AFAIK. | | | |
| ▲ | jolt42 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It doesn't seem they address the quality of the final products, just how the companies are run. Anecdotally, I know tons of nurses wear Hoka shoes and act like they are to die for, but yet Hoka is on the avoid list. It would be more interesting rather than some vague articles about the brand to actually compare reviews before / after or how they match up against Consumer Reports --- a much more valuable resource in my mind. | |
| ▲ | fwip 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It's fully LLM-written. You can trust it if you want, but there's stuff in there that's clearly wrong or nonsensical. |
| |
| ▲ | jolt42 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | True, recently Rachel Ray sold her dog food brand. I didn't know until my dog started having digestion issues with it. That's how I found out it had been sold and other dogs were also having issues. Apparently buyer cheapened the recipe. At least we have the internet to quickly get the word out that it isn't what it used to be. | | |
| ▲ | techpression 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | There’s a special place in hell for people who would buy a dog food brand only to make worse dog food… |
| |
| ▲ | jerf 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Everything has become a lemon market: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Market_for_Lemons Even if a brand stays solid for 100 years, for all I know as I'm standing there in the store deciding whether to buy something, private equity bought them two quarters ago and hollowed them out. Harvard MBAs/private equity sees brand reputation as just another resource to be converted into money. If I were a billionaire my dream would be to create a logo for the "We Put The Extra 10% In It" program where products could advertise that they put the extra effort in. What is really sad to me is that so often it's not even that much extra effort, which is why I say 10% and not 100% or 10x. So often it's just "used a 5 cent metal part instead of a 1.2 cent plastic part". But without a reliable signal that the effort is there MBAs/private equity turns every market everywhere into a lemon market. Way too much tech is applied in manufacturing to turn everything into a lemon market. | | |
| ▲ | iamnothere 23 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | I wish more brands would follow the Newman’s Own charity model. All profits go to charity, so there isn’t an incentive to hollow out the brand, and the products are a reliable quality at a decent price. Apparently they set up an organization to help other people do this: https://100forpurpose.org/ | |
| ▲ | Thlom 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Yeah. On various "Buy it for life" forums it's a daily occurence that someone mentions a brand they bought 5 years ago and then someone chimes in that they were sold or restructured last year and now it's no longer "buy it for life". Some brands kind of split up so products sold in one market is cheap knockoffs while products sold in the home market is still high quality manufactured at the old factory with 100 years old machinery and experienced workers. If you want to buy quality you've got to do deep research first. | |
| ▲ | saturn8601 14 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Worker owned cooperatives could be a reliable indicator however i'm not sure there are many examples of this being scaled upwards, like could an airline do that? Could they even have an option for a worker owned company provide an alternative for everything in the economy? You need capital to make a competitor and all the capital is rapidly being sucked up by the people enshittifying everything. The answer probably lies in fixing government so that they can go after these players. However to fix government you need massive buy in from both the left and the right and there lies the crux. Our system forces us to cater to the lowest common denominator voter. Until that is fixed we can't go back to the status quo. Maybe its not possible anymore as our currency gets inflated down to nothing. The alternative could be to just live in this enshittified system, leave the US to a country with a functioning government, or just accept that mass consumerism has run its course and lower your lifestyle needs to only own less items but of higher quality that have been researched(this requires time investment so you are forced to research what is good which limits how much you can cover if you consume too much). | |
| ▲ | VorpalWay 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | One signal (not fool proof, but often a good signal): what length of warranty do they offer? If some brand has a warranty significantly above the average for the product type, that can be a good sign. And I'm not talking about offering extended warranty programs or such here. Just the basic warranty everyone gets when they buy the product. | | |
| ▲ | 0cf8612b2e1e an hour ago | parent [-] | | A buddy of mine paid a premium to get some fancy umbrella with a lifetime warranty. It had a failure at some point, they replaced it with a worse quality one. Another failure, and he got another step down in quality. So, the company kinda honored the contract. | | |
| ▲ | saturn8601 3 minutes ago | parent [-] | | There is also other tricks I fell for. I think I saw a recommendation for Travelpro on Buy it for life(Its been a while so dont remember fully). Nice luggage but expensive. I took a risk and bought it. I received it the day I was rushing to travel and there was some "registration card" that you had to fill out by a certain time that unlocked lifetime warranty else you were stuck with a shorter limited warranty. That card got accidently thrown out by a family member while I was on a trip. It apparently had some serial number or something on it. To make matters worse, the zipper got damaged after 1-2 uses and it was just outside the shorter warranty. I had to go to a local luggage place that had a relationship with them and they were able to get it replaced. (I wanted it fixed but Travelpro only offered replacement). Im hoping it does not break again. If you are going to advertise this warranty just make it the default! I went back to those reddit posts and I started to suspect there is some astroturfing going on so I don't even know if this is a reliable luggage or if it is just junk. It was so expensive and I honestly thought I bought it for life. |
|
| |
| ▲ | WalterBright 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | And yet it's socialism that has a reputation for shoddy products. How many people want to buy a Lada? | | |
| ▲ | Xirdus 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Both historical socialism and current-stage capitalism suffer from the exact same problem - lack of competition and limited access to information. They arrived there in vastly different ways but in both cases it's very hard both to know how to obtain higher quality goods, and to actually obtain them once you know how. Compare to 1960s USA where it was quite easy to know which car/drill/grill/TV/pants/table/etc. is guaranteed to last you years. | | |
| ▲ | WalterBright an hour ago | parent [-] | | I lived through the 60s and know what the goods were. TVs, for example. They had tubes then, and crummy B+W pictures. They were constantly going on the fritz, to the point that drugstores had tube testing stations. You'd bring in the tubes from the TV and test them in this device that looked like an arcade game, and buy replacements. Cars then required a lot more maintenance then. And I mean a lot. I've owned and repaired them. I can go on, but the point is made. |
| |
| ▲ | tristor 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [flagged] | | |
| |
| ▲ | jolt42 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yeah, hardly anybody in it for the long-haul. I hear we might be living longer relatively soon, maybe that will change the mindset. |
| |
| ▲ | testdelacc1 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > it’s expensive to be poor https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boots_theory “The reason that the rich were so rich, Vimes reasoned, was because they managed to spend less money. Take boots, for example. ... A really good pair of leather boots cost fifty dollars. But an affordable pair of boots, which were sort of OK for a season or two and then leaked like hell when the cardboard gave out, cost about ten dollars. ... But the thing was that good boots lasted for years and years. A man who could afford fifty dollars had a pair of boots that'd still be keeping his feet dry in ten years' time, while a poor man who could only afford cheap boots would have spent a hundred dollars on boots in the same time and would still have wet feet.” | | |
| ▲ | jolt42 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It really pisses me off there are used car lots that obviously prey on the poor. I asked for their cash price and they wouldn't give me one, or it was ridiculously priced. They just want for people to pay off a debt and all the interest that goes with it. | | |
| ▲ | scheme271 5 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | In the US, a lot of car dealerships make a good portion of the profits from a car sale from the loan. E.g. the lender gives the dealer a kickback on the loan and that is a good portion of the total profit. It's somewhat analogous to how US airlines make their profits from credit card deals and selling miles. | |
| ▲ | WalterBright 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | A car dealership makes most of their money off of the financing. > I asked for their cash price and they wouldn't give me one When I bought a car from a dealer, the dealer told me that what I wanted was impossible. So I walked out and got in my car, and started to back out. The salesman came running out and agreed to my terms. The trick to making a good deal is a willingness to walk away. P.S. My accounting teacher used to work at a used car lot. He explained to me that poor people tended to screw themselves by not understanding how financing works. He'd try to explain it to them, and they'd accuse him of trying to screw them, and they'd go for the more expensive option. I tell this story to people who say that learning math in school is irrelevant. I also remember a Frontline episode years ago on 401k plans. One company had an identical plan for all employees. The reporters discovered that the higher paid employees had better returns on the 401k plans. Why was it that the lower paid ones did poorly with them? It was they did not understand how to manage investments. | |
| ▲ | ssl-3 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Up in my neck of the woods, it depends. I paid cash for the last two used cars I bought. As used cars go they weren't particularly expensive and it wasn't a big deal. Both purchases came from dealerships that also sold and serviced things like brand new Hondas or Chevrolets. For one of those cars, the paperwork was completely finished and I drove off in that new-to-me car without me even giving them a dime. (I did promise in writing that they'd have a check in a few days, and I did make good on that promise.) There's also used car lots that work with real financing companies. They broker the financing deal and get paid for it. That works, too. (I've financed cars at these places, too; this also went smoothly.) --- But then, too: There are buy-here, pay-here used car lots. These are traps for the poor, and they love their particular financing game. At these places: The loans are designed to be very upside down and they therefore hold all of the cards. They'll sell a used car for years of weekly payments of $120, and if/when the payments stop then they just turn the car off remotely and have someone go pick it up. After that, it's cleaned up and sold to the next guy for $120 a week. It's a very profitable way to conduct business and nobody of any substantial means and sane mind would ever buy anything there at all. But they don't check credit, and they don't report credit. So as ugly and expensive as it is, for some folks that's the only way they can get the car they need to try to survive in the society that they were born into. | |
| ▲ | budman1 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | There are two kinds of lots.
'normal' lots will sell a car, and the financing comes from a finance company. could be a bank, could be a credit union, could be a business that provides money to car purchasers.
the normal lot has markup on the price, and also gets a kickback from the finance company. the car buyer does not pay, the finance company has a problem. 'buy here, pay here' lots sell a car, and do the financing. They buy cars at auction, fix them if they have to, then sell them. The down payment money usually covers the auction cost of the car. Then every 2 weeks, the buyers drops by with a payment. The buyer stops paying, the car is repossessed. And then it is sold again. The dealer wins in both directions; the buyer pays a lot of money in finance charges, and if it is repossessed then you don't have to buy new inventory at the auction. Poor people with bad credit way over pay for cars both ways. One a little worse than the other. | |
| ▲ | lazyasciiart 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Even worse: they want people to fail to pay it off, so they get half the debt amount and then get the car back to do it again. |
| |
| ▲ | therealdrag0 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I always felt this was over stated, but I think it’s become less true over time. First different people treat their stuff harder than others. I basically never break or wear out anything, and I usually start with the cheapest option. Second the quality of cheap shit made in Asia has gone up a lot over the last couple decades. And it is very difficult to know how to pay more for more quality. | | |
| ▲ | pydry 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | ive experimented with paying more for a few things and sometimes it's the cheap stuff which lasts forever. i have a pair of cheap Chinese earbuds that way outlasted all of the expensive ones I ever bought. |
| |
| ▲ | jolt42 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I'll admit sometimes I like there is a cheap-o version as I'm not sure how much I'll end up using it. | |
| ▲ | nradov 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I don't know why people keep posting that silly quote. Outside of fantasy novels, in the real world the most expensive footwear is often the least durable, and you can get decent boots at Walmart for <$50 on clearance sales. |
| |
| ▲ | BoingBoomTschak 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | If you want one I continue to really trust almost blindly: Genelec (Finnish pro audio). Not even that expensive for what it is. |
|