| ▲ | bigstrat2003 a day ago |
| In a few years they will be the only competent people left who can save us from the deluge of AI slop. You should be nice to them, because you'll need them someday. |
|
| ▲ | gleezard a day ago | parent | next [-] |
| In a few years they will be the only competent people left who can use a loom. You should be nice to them, because you’ll need them someday. |
| |
| ▲ | valegrete a day ago | parent [-] | | The difference is that the textile machine workers could immediately verify the work product. This is impossible when the work product is a configuration of knowledge you don't actually have. It's why, for example, amateurs "solving" these open math problems refuse to discuss the results with actual mathematicians, because they can't. So we have a bunch of Lean-verified slop that may or may not actually prove what is claimed, without experts poring over everything line-by-line and reverse engineering. | | |
| ▲ | gleezard a day ago | parent [-] | | Wrong. Coding is a solved problem.
Mathematics is a solved problem.
Physics is a solved problem.
Biology is a solved problem.
Cancer is a solved problem. | | |
| ▲ | owebmaster 20 hours ago | parent [-] | | AI can't even solve spamming, astroturfing, brigading, green accounts posting ragebait. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | esikich a day ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Do you think information is going to be destroyed or something? If this AI stuff is so sub par, why would anyone read/use/interact with it? Why wouldn't the "better" human created stuff float to the top? |
