| ▲ | sph a day ago | |
> Maybe we should vote for people who are financially literate, can think long term, and can "conserve" rather than politicians who promise endlessly? Maybe we should consider the possibility that there is no such candidate, or if there is, they cannot compete against the 'populists'. What then? | ||
| ▲ | rdm_blackhole a day ago | parent [-] | |
> they cannot compete against the 'populists' You have to consider the fact that the populists are only popular because all the other parties in the last 20 years have made endless promises to the voters and failed to accomplish a tenth (if I am being generous) of what said they would do. At some point, the blame as to lie also with whoever came before them too. | ||