| ▲ | ShadowOfThePit 12 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> Data reviewed by the EFF included searches labelled 'LMAO', 'LOL', 'Hehe', 'Haha', 'idk' and 'blah'. Other entries included 'asdfg' and strings of apparently random keyboard characters. In one case, an officer entered: 'robbery I don't remember the case number leave me alone'. lol wtf. Like, I get it, "haha quirky me", if it was a personal coding project or an informal setting, but not here!? I wouldn't believe if you told me they were older than, what, 30? On second thought, that's absolutely possible. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | cogman10 12 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
So, I've actually implemented a system like this for my work. It's completely non-shocking to me that a unchecked and unvalided "reason" field ends up with nothing but garbage in it to get past the software checks. My 3 "words" requirement because managers wanted more than just "caus" ended up with workers simply putting in "a o k". These systems need more validation and teeth than simply letting the officers enter whatever text allows them to search. A case number isn't enough, IMO. There needs to be an actual warrant which the system checks. But further, misuse needs to be prosecuted (I know, fat chance). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | a34729t 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This sounds exactly what happens when you are required to fill out a reason for say a deployment to your test enrvironment in a jira ticket. After a certain point you just stop obeying cause nobody reads the ticket anyways. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | dylan604 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I mean, if the field is required and is open text with no requirement that the text be useful, why would you bother? How many of use put stupid text into fields just to get to the download? Yeah yeah, cops are supposed to be above blah blah, but they are human. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | guywithahat 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What do you mean "not here"? They're looking at video footage of public places, I would not care either. I'm not happy about flock cameras but this is not like he's filling out paperwork for a charge or doing something important, these cops are looking at existing camera data of public spaces | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | mingus88 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cops are not known for being well regulated individuals The obvious flaw is that someone added this field as a requirement but they never actually audit it and hold officers accountable I think you can trace both of these problems back to the police union. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||