In this case CSS-Tricks got paid $4m first, so probably the wrong entity to be complaining about funding. But maybe the lead editor in question who’s not the creator didn’t see much of that?

▲

boredpudding an hour ago | parent [-]

CSS-Tricks didn't get paid $4m. They got acquired. The previous owner of CSS-Tricks got $4m.

▲

oefrha an hour ago | parent [-]

Got acquired => got paid. CSS-Tricks the entity (up to the point of acquisition) got paid the money. If and how the money was divided between the people involved doesn’t seem be public info.

▲

geoffgraham 43 minutes ago | parent [-]

It wasn't divided.

	▲	oefrha 40 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Too bad then.