| ▲ | 25 Years of Mass Surveillance Is Enough [Auth: Cindy Cohn; Bruce Schneier](lawfaremedia.org) |
| 38 points by mdp2021 2 hours ago | 5 comments |
| |
|
| ▲ | ChrisArchitect a few seconds ago | parent | next [-] |
| [dupe] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49710883 |
|
| ▲ | hurfdurf an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49710883 |
|
| ▲ | FrankWilhoit 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Any discussion of this must center the fact that the surveillance began in Jan.-Feb. 2001, NOT after 11 September. The one telecom executive who objected was instantly framed into prison. |
| |
| ▲ | leonidasrup 7 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Nacchio "
He was convicted of 19 counts of insider trading in Qwest stock on April 19, 2007 – charges his defense team claimed were U.S. government retaliation for his refusal to give customer data to the National Security Agency in February, 2001. This defense was not admissible in court because the U.S. Department of Justice filed an in limine motion, which is often used in national security cases, to exclude information which may reveal state secrets. Information from the Classified Information Procedures Act hearings in Nacchio's case was likewise ruled inadmissible.
" | |
| ▲ | bilekas 26 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Just because we've been handling privacy terribly forever so far, doesn't means we should continue to though. |
|
