Any model is good enough. Even tiny local models can provide some value and their false positive rate is still relatively low and warrants a proper reply.

▲

nvch 2 hours ago | parent [-]

With tiny models, we're getting into the territory of horoscopes and divination. While it is possible for a sentient being to derive value by using them as a random seed for thinking, the value is produced by something different from the seed.

	▲	avadodin an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Have you tried and how do they compare to human models as in the average human in a review? I wouldn't put a lot of weight into an all-clear result but if Ling tiny tells me my function lacks an essential check it will force me to consider it seriously or to explicitly clarify that such checks are not relevant.