| ▲ | scheme271 a day ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
It seems that btrfs is being phased out of fedora. It looks like Fedora will be moving to stratis storage over the next year or two. Btrfs is nice but it's raid5/6 support still seems shaky and there's odd corner cases that apply to all btrfs setups (getting stuck when free space is low is mostly resolved but can still occur). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ghaff 18 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I no longer have the direct relationships with storage folks at Red Hat that I once did and that stuff may all be over on the IBM side anyway. Stratis (which I wasn't familiar with) does seem to be designed with the intention of bringing a lot of pooling etc. on top of a conventional file system but haven't really looked at or talked to anyone in the storage groups recently. Conventional LVM was pretty old and really designed for a different time. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ghaff a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I'm not super-plugged into Fedora these days. Red Hat has long been pretty comfortable with a more conventional file system (think it's still XFS out of SGI by default) plus volume management for RHEL. ZFS was a non-starter for licensing reasons and Oracle; btrfs just wasn't there. I suspect things could have played out differently had Oracle relicensed ZFS once upon a time but that ship has likely sailed in a variety of ways. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | fpoling a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stratis does not support data integrity checksums. There is dm-integrity hack but it slows down the write speed by halve. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||