They shouldn't.

I personally would never dump a claude code response into a PR body an ask someone to address it. I can't believe any developer would find this to be appropriate or fulfilling the duty of reviewing code.

I think it's pretty clear that what you should do instead is go over the result and communicate to the PR author anything you think should be addressed. You don't just say "here are 8 things you might want to address but I cant actually speak to any of them."

Indeed.

To add to this, the fact that Claude so often tries to deviate from defined architecture can be really frustrating if you're working in a mature codebase.