| ▲ | polytely an hour ago | |||||||||||||
how does this work from a liability standpoint? seems very risky for the person who is legally responsible for the business | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ocimbote an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Accountability, that's the liability everyone seems to have forgotten in our LLM-driven era. You can close your eyes as much you want during your sessions with Claude or whatever, at the end of the day, only a human can be held accountable. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | elmo2you 16 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
If you use this as a (legal/registered) business, it will be that legal business entity that is responsible. If that business want's to blame the software, it can do so and go after the makers of the software, but that remains a matter between that business and its "supplier". It won't absolve the business for whatever damage it does downstream. Running this as an individual, without the legal shielding a business typically gives you against being prosecuted on personal title, seriously risky. There will no doubt be "bros" that will do it anyway and flaunt all they've achieved with that. But they might be just one glitch away from going to jail (if not for running a business without a registration, which in many jurisdictions is illegal by itself). | ||||||||||||||