In this case, who holds the agency is exactly the point. Anthropic and OAI are claiming we need protection from AI itself, but the statement supported by putting agency in the right place is that we need protection from them.

▲

qarl an hour ago | parent [-]

I think those companies are referring to other companies - say Chinese AI companies - who we also need protection from.

▲

GolfPopper 27 minutes ago | parent [-]

"We" need protection from, or "OpenAI and Anthroptic's dreams of profits" need protection from?

	▲	qarl 17 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		I think that AI is dangerous and could be used as a weapon. So yes, I would like to be protected from all parties. I don't think that's nuts.