| ▲ | atleastoptimal an hour ago | |
This article reads like it was written by Claude. Also those at Anthropic genuinely believe AI could lead to doom, that's why they started the company, they believe only they can be stewards of digital gods. Whether you believe it or not, they genuinely do, and wouldn't voluntarily sow fear, uncertainty and doubt in their product when it doesn't guarantee benefits. This is an instance of work in a genre I call "AI lab grievance poetry" where a vast collection of criticisms are levied against AI labs, with specifc ad-hominems towards the executives, while avoiding the core of their arguments about AI risk | ||
| ▲ | mlsu an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |
If you actually believe that your invention will lead to the extinction of humanity, you would be acting very very differently. Namely, you would not be inventing the thing that you think is going to kill all of humanity, and probably you would be doing everything in your power to prevent it from being invented, up to and including sabotage of the company that YOU work for, which is currently trying to invent that thing. And yet, here's Fable 6, more capable than ever before, oh BTW we are IPOing, oh, BTW, I have stock options... | ||
| ▲ | phoghed an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
The author specifically calls out that the analysis is done by perplexity | ||
| ▲ | beepbooptheory 40 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
In your mind, what arguments about AI risk are ignored by these poems? | ||
| ▲ | goatlover an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |
> they believe only they can be stewards of digital gods You do't see how absurd that sounds? Not only the idea that they can create gods, but that they are the only good stewards for such beings. It's also incredibly arrogant. | ||