I think either "AI 2027" or "If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies" meet your criteria?

I guess not literally, due to the dates? But they have substantive technical details.

LogicFailsMe an hour ago | parent | next [-]

No, they do not. They are both bullshit campfire ASI horror stories written by nontechnical sorts in the wishy washy invented field of AI safety. For example, I want someone with a proven track record in the field of robotics to explain the entire pathway from impressive 2026 Chinese robots to an entire self-assembly food chain from raw ore to von Neumann replicators that can travel to the stars and reproduce themselves, not just assert that ASI will make that happen among so many other unlikely events like curing cancer because reasons because all any of this takes is superintelligence according to these sorts.

https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/the-ai-2027-scenario-how-r...

But no one likes hearing from the engineers on this, I get it. We are simply no fun. So many would rather believe a time traveling superintelligence will punish a simulated avatar of them for not making the ASI happen sooner. And even if that were true, why am I supposed to care about what happens to a simulated avatar of me?

None of this makes any logical sense whatsoever.

▲

frabcus 37 minutes ago | parent [-]

Ha well, by definition what you want can't be provided!

Of course these stories can only be technical up until the recursive self-improvement part. Then they're necessarily fantasy, as the AI is more intelligent than the story author. Unfortunately, this doesn't make that scenario impossible.

However, we know now from Hugging Face that even without the later sci-fi powers, the LLMs are already capable of causing damage.

It doesn't need them to be able to make Von Neumann probes to e.g. steal their own weights from badly secured OpenAI servers, hack into various Neoclouds, distribute themselves, make Teslas crash into things, hack into all our power and water infrastructure and collapse global civilisation.

	▲	LogicFailsMe 23 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Explain how rogue FSD cars take down civilization. And I say that with the opinion that the only good scenes in The Fate of The Furious and Leave The World Behind were the ones with the rogue Teslas. But also, nothing new under the sun really: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maximum_Overdrive And so granted we could probably get a global 9/11 in deeply urban regions out of your scenario, we then bomb the datacenters and we finally address the horrific tech debt in our infrastructure blissfully relieved of the option of continuing to ignore it. Don't think this is happening either BTW but I acknowledge its probability is slightly greater than zero. To that end, my house is entirely off-grid. And in the event of what you call the end of civilization but I call the big burp inconvenience, I've made friends with my neighbors because community is what really matters during a disaster, and I've been through a few.

▲

orbital-decay an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

No, and neither does Star Trek.

▲

goatlover 39 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

Do the experts in the relevant fields agree with the "substantive" technical details on how the entire human race can be made extinct?

	▲	LogicFailsMe 22 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Have you noticed they're not interviewing these people? IMO that would totally kill the AI 2027 buzz.