I appreciate the minimalist HN aesthetic, but without some context I'm not willing to click a mystery link to "Tender Lovemaking dot com".

▲

wiremine 7 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

It's the personal blog for a well-known Rubyist (i.e., a person who programs in the Ruby programming language). Rubyists teld to be a bit more colorful than your typical software developer (in a good way... most of the time).

▲

saxonww 25 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Don't worry! It's actually "Tenderlove Making," going by how the site header is constructed. Definitely a maker/hacker site, and not whatever you were thinking. Hope this allays your concern.

▲

bliteben an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I miss when the internet was fun

▲

BowBun 21 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You should learn who the author is, then. Part of learning about our ecosystem.

▲

emerongi 35 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

What’s with the fear of tender lovemaking? Not your thing?

▲

layer8 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You get some context by clicking on the “(tenderlovemaking.com)” in parentheses after the title.

▲

wing-_-nuts 33 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This made me laugh. I too, browse like corporate security is sitting at my desk.

	▲	ultrarunner 21 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Pretty incredible how much humans can be conditioned, isn’t it?

▲

rietta an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The site is safe. It has been a trademark of Aaron Patterson a core Ruby on Rails contributor for decades.

▲

AdamH12113 39 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's about OpenAI's RubyGems hack. Totally safe for work.

▲

pelagicAustral 44 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Firefox has got some kind of feature to take a peek at at a link by hovering or something... Now I understand the usecase.

	▲	suslik 37 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		… a feature which, at least for me, is rendered almost entirely useless by massive cookie banners that always cover the entire field of view of the hover. But, surprisingly, not in this specific case.
	▲	bigmattystyles 17 minutes ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		From an infosec/networking stand point, aren’t still actively loading the site? Whether it’s in a preview window or not?
	▲	InitialLastName 26 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Presumably the browser still has to fetch the page in that case, right? From a "surveilled net traffic" perspective, how is that different than clicking the link?

▲

SenHeng an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Based on the thumbnail I think it’s actually tenderlove making dot com, though I agree with your sentiment.

▲

madaxe_again 44 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

Oh but you’ll go to expert sex change dot com?