| ▲ | WarmWash an hour ago | |||||||||||||
Then the correct action is to either create a competitor, or point money/ad views at a competitor. But like I said, the internet is largely unwilling to do this. You won't make a competitor that is a charity, and the internet at large won't point dollars and ad-views at a nascent start-up in the space. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | kennywinker a minute ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
> But like I said, the internet is largely unwilling to do this Sorry, what? The internet is unwilling to create twitter clones? Bluesky, mastodon, pleroma, misskey, diaspora, threads, fucking truth social… there is no shortage of twitter alternatives. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | thewebguyd an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
None of that has to do with blocking the content behind a login wall. X can still serve ads just fine to non-logged in users. I'm against the site running ads, at all, I'm against mandatory account creation. The internet ran ad supported without mandatory accounts for years. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||