|
| ▲ | immibis2 31 minutes ago | parent | next [-] |
| If two things are competing, they are in the same market by definition. |
|
| ▲ | wongarsu 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| If LLMs only made SO redundant by writing code and solving my technical problems autonomously so I never have to think about it, I would agree. But often I do ask LLMs technical questions, and they answer in great detail. And that part is a very direct SO competitor |
|
| ▲ | darkwater 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| And what would be a read-only version of X like XCancel compete against, exactly? Ads impressions? That would be the only possible thing yet they don't add any ads. |
| |
| ▲ | brainwad 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | It's depriving X of impressions that they could monetise, no? Xcancel doesn't have to make money itself, it just has to impair the rights of the copyright holder. Otherwise piracy would also be legal as long as it were non-profit... | | |
| ▲ | darkwater 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | > Otherwise piracy would also be legal as long as it were non-profit... Which is in a few jurisdictions, or at least is not prosecuted if it's for personal use.
Also, according to your definition, the creator of uBlock Origin or any other adblock system should be sued in the same way, because they are depriving $ADS_CORP of their precious impressions. | | |
| ▲ | brainwad 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Well, adblockers don't copy the copyrighted content. They just control how it's rendered on the user's machine. Copyright cares about making copies and especially distributing them. | | |
| ▲ | darkwater 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | You have a point on this, I recognize, but it still seems a very thin line to walk (for X) - at least morally, because I don't think they are actually loosing real big money to anyone. |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | bluefirebrand 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I don't really buy this. It's like saying "toaster oven/air fryer combos" don't actually compete with toaster ovens or air fryers because they are creating a market for something better Of course they complete. Toaster ovens compete with toasters. Microwaves compete with toaster ovens. Just because it's not the exact same product doesn't mean it's not competing Would I be allowed to steal LG's designs for a microwave and make a "superwave" that does laundry and heats food? Would you claim those products don't compete because the superwave is "something better"? |
| |
| ▲ | brainwad 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | It's not illegal to write a similar book or song to an existing one. Copyright only protects existing works from literal copying (possibly in part). | | |
|
