Remix.run Logo
simondotau 9 hours ago

If you don’t like X, I don’t understand why anyone would use a service like XCancel, which effectively helps maintain the cultural relevance of X.

On a practical level, I’m also wondering what consistent legal standard people want when it comes to things like terms of service and individuals' copyright. It's unworkable to maintain one rule for the awesome people we might like and and another rule for the horrible despots we might not like.

sureglymop 9 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It's because X is chosen (wrongfully) as the main communications channel of all kinds of important public institutions and people (police departments, city administrations, politicians, etc.).

Of course that's a real issue since the whole thing is login gated and inaccessible. But unfortunately it is the reality. So I think something like XCancel is needed.

asdff 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I have no clue what my local government or any such authority could possibly tweet that would be relevant to me. I have not checked their twitter feeds ever and I am none the worse for wear.

LightBug1 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Well, I stopped using Shitter first. Then I stopped using xCancel as a conduit for Shitter. Never happier.

IF those public institutions want to to connect with all their constituents, then move to a better platform. Not the other way around.

simondotau 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Maybe if people didn't make services like XCancel, the impracticality of X would be more salient.

mitxela 9 hours ago | parent [-]

It isn't. We know this because there was a time before xcancel and people just accepted they needed an account.

It can happen - nobody would post an Instagram link to HN. But for X it did not happen.

Notice the EU's Digital Markets Act is a liability shield for Nitter instances hosted in the EU.

nativeit 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

That assumes the people who need XCancel most are aware of its existence, but from what I can tell only folks like us are.

roryirvine 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]

sunaurus 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

For me, it's just the easiest fix whenever somebody shares a tweet with me, and it fails to load, or shows me some forced login popup. I just click between x and .com in my URL bar, write "cancel", and it suddenly just works.

mitxela 9 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Get the Libredirect extension and this will happen automatically (to a server that is actually working).

LightBug1 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I used to be you. Now I just dismiss the tweet.

Shitter is now irrelevant for me. If you want my engagement or attention or response or to keep up with you, move to a better platform.

I used to care enough to keep up with Shitter on xcancel. Now it's just faded into irrelevance. YMMV, particularly over time

Shitter isn't the gospel of human experience and creativity and expression. It's just ... Shitter.

Kotlopou 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's a standard coordination problem: I don't like X, but some discussion happens there (e.g. plenty of competent mathematicians responding to the Navier-Stokes situation) and I cannot force people to move elsewhere.

simondotau 9 hours ago | parent [-]

I think Wikipedia has become a cancerous blight on world politics, and I would love to see Wikipedia die so that a Mastodon-like distributed alternative could rise from the ashes.

But I still use Wikipedia.

smaudet 9 hours ago | parent [-]

And yet, wikipedia is not owned by an evil (incompetent?) oligarch who made his mission to make the platform as shitty as possible...

That's what Grok as for.

Apples and Oranges...

simondotau 8 hours ago | parent [-]

> And yet, wikipedia is not owned by...

That is a red herring. A corporation can act ethically. A charity can act disgracefully.

A government can protect people. A neighbourhood association can bully them.

A billionare can be philanthropic. A group of children can terrorise a community.

mitxela 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Suppose you're on HN and someone posts a link to X. Is the correct reaction

1. Pretend it isn't there. 2. Flag it and pretend it isn't there. 3. Flag it and read the content somewhere else in case it's relevant.

madeofpalk 9 hours ago | parent | next [-]

You can knowledge it's there, and just not read it. There's lots of links on the internet that I don't click.

I'm sure there are people who genuinely need to receive information that's only on that site, but personally I'm enjoying the feeling of the joy of missing out.

mitxela 8 hours ago | parent [-]

What if the post is like "we discovered AGI (for real this time, not clickbait)" - will you pretend AGI wasn't discovered?

madeofpalk 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

If it's important enough, it'll be elsewhere.

addandsubtract 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That would A) still be clickbait, and B) be posted on a corporate blog, not just X.

fWEFVEEGLKJH 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> (for real this time, not clickbait)

That sounds likes something a clickbait author would write.

simondotau 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

4. Click the link

5. Accept that you won't click on the link

vrganj 9 hours ago | parent [-]

Congratulations, Elon Musk has just forced you to either feed his propaganda machine or successfully locked you out of the conversation.

frumplestlatz 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Given its extremely liberal content moderation policy, how is X a propaganda machine?

nickthegreek 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

algo is what can make or break a propaganda machine.

vrganj 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Here's a pretty in-depth investigation into the workings of X as far-right propaganda machine: https://news.sky.com/story/the-x-effect-how-elon-musk-is-boo...

> right-wing content was shown most prominently, regardless of users' political leaning.

> Left-wing users saw almost the same amount of left-wing and right-wing content, even though they only followed left-wing accounts. But only 14% of the political content sent to our right-leaning users was left-wing.

> The neutral users saw twice as much right-wing content as left-wing content. And barely any of the political content shown to our X users was non-partisan.

> Over half of the political content shown to our new X users came from accounts categorised as extreme. Of the content from extreme authors, 72% of posts came from right-leaning accounts.

frumplestlatz 3 hours ago | parent [-]

So journalists ran a study with extremely poor sampling, base rate, and classification methodology designed by left-wing researchers and activists groups (including groups explicitly opposed to X), found the conclusions they wanted to find, and spent the second half of their article decrying the lack of heavy-handed moderation that pre-Musk Twitter used to control speech.

All we can actually derive from that article is that X’s new user recommendation system exposed a small number of near-default, low-feedback, synthetic accounts to more content that left-wing “misinformation” researchers classified as “right-wing”.

monocasa 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Musk also uses plenty of heavy handed moderation; it's just almost all directed at the left. For instance: https://crimethinc.com/2022/11/25/elon-musk-bans-crimethinc-...

frumplestlatz 2 hours ago | parent [-]

They were banned for literally advocating for political violence. The fact that they hadn’t been banned earlier is the only concerning fact here.

The current top article on their website argues for punching their political opponents in the streets.

monocasa 2 hours ago | parent [-]

And yet right wingers openly calling for the west to ethnically cleanse the non white races get reinstated.

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/elon-mus...

And simply criticizing Musk is enough to get a shadow ban

https://futurism.com/twitter-shadow-ban-elon-musk

frumplestlatz an hour ago | parent [-]

Andrew Anglin, the subject of the first article, was re-banned in 2023 for the same reason that crimethink, inc was banned.

The subjects of the second article are particularly odious right-wing conspiracy theorists and racists that lost their reach, which they believe was connected to arguing with Elon.

That seems like an action you’d be in favor of, and also it counters the propaganda claim — but regardless, their claim that they were shadow-banned, that the cause was direct intercession by Elon, and that the motivation was their merely disagreeing with him, is unsupported by any evidence.

monocasa an hour ago | parent [-]

He had already been banned for the same reason, and Musk unbanned him in the same wave that had him ban crimethinc.

vrganj 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I'm not sure where you got any of that from. Where are you reading anything about the researchers working for Sky News, a Comcast subsidiary (!) being "left wing"? What are you basing your criticism of sampling and classification on?

I provided a study that literally won the Royal Statistical Societies' "Statistical Excellence in Journalism" award [0]. You provided unfounded dismissal and conspiracy. The burden of proof is on your side.

[0] https://rss.org.uk/news-publication/news-publications/2026/g...

frumplestlatz 2 hours ago | parent [-]

[dead]

simondotau 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Yes, and? I can't bend reality to make it otherwise.

vrganj 8 hours ago | parent [-]

XCancel can.

simondotau 8 hours ago | parent [-]

"XCancel Taken Down Again" is the title of this thread.

vrganj 8 hours ago | parent [-]

Indeed. But they've been doing good work and fighting is better than just giving in to apathy and losing by default.

zem 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

at the very least whoever posts the link has presumably accessed it, so we should normalise pasting the full text in here

amelius 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I wish HN would simply ban links to X.

browningstreet 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

If you think that's remotely viable, you'll be very surprised what most of the YC partners believe and post about on X.

mitxela 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

HN is a venture capital fund. That will happen if and only if it becomes profitable to do so.

simondotau 8 hours ago | parent [-]

If you want to make the rules, start your own club.

captainbadass33 2 hours ago | parent [-]

[flagged]

9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]
dandellion 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I don't have an X account, and I only use xcancel when someone sends me a link. The reason it's impossible to completely avoid both of them, at least in my corner of the world is that a lot of public organisms seem to think publishing information online exclusively on Twitter is okay, and if you complain they tend to ignore you (I admit I haven't tried complaining about it on Twitter, which seems to be the only thing that works these days).

slowmovintarget 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Not every org is going to run their own site. I have a similar frustration with companies that post on Facebook or Instagram. I deleted my Facebook account years ago.

If they post on Reddit, it gets lost in the sea.

LightBug1 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I've stopped using xcancel even for that. If anything is important enough, it will reach me via other channels. Particularly from any contact who give af ... if they don't it's not important.

pibaker 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I want to read stuff from twitter not because I like the twitter culture but because sometimes something happens and the only place you can learn about it is twitter. Like it or not Twitter is still the most relevant platform for tech related information.

smaudet 9 hours ago | parent [-]

Like it or not network effects can be overcome, but not with this sort of prisoner's dilemma thinking.

Everyone using something was never a (good) reason to use it.

phyzome 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Today, for me, the reason was because I wanted to pull up a years-old tweet that had a video of a local road flooding.

Leonard_of_Q 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I never liked Twitter and I don't like X as a medium but they were and still are used by others as a communication channel. To partake of what is communicated without having to sign up and/or subject myself to the barrage of nonsense spewed through X I use a self-hosted Nitter instance. This way I get to follow those X links without needing a (real, active) account. For passive X users Nitter offers a far better - lighter, faster - experience than X itself. This makes Nitter (which is what Xcancel - a misnomer since it doesn't cancel X - is based on) especially useful for those who only use X because others used it to distribute information.

johannes1234321 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

There are places like government agencies, public transit org aisations, and similar organisations, which still use it as adhoc quick notification channel. If I want to see if a train route ist interrupted it's the best source. However using it once in a while (not via app or such) has long loading times and nagging screens for sign in, cookie compliance and so on, which makes the whole thing an annoyance ...

Of course the right thing is to lobby those organizations to switch. But that won't help with the immediate situation.

m3kw9 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yeah i don't get it, using xcancel is like "that'll show ya" in a weak manner. You are seeing the same tweet.

somedude895 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Exactly. If you boycott X, shouldn't you also boycott the people who are on X? But this kind of slacktivism has always been more virtue signaling than anything.

azan_ 9 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I don’t want to crate account there because I’ll get into endless useless discussions. And you can’t use this website without an account.

pickleRick243 9 hours ago | parent [-]

why is that? Why can't you just use it in read only fashion?

fabian2k 9 hours ago | parent | next [-]

No idea how it looks right now, but at some point Twitter started to block reading replies without an account. And sometimes it blocked even more, so you could not follow links to read.

frogulis 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I think this changed recently, but at least prior to that, when not logged in, you only saw the initial post and none of the replies.

8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]
MPSimmons 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It seems intellectually dishonest to blanket-label any principled stance that you disagree with as "virtue signaling".

pickleRick243 9 hours ago | parent [-]

I think the claim is that the principled stance would be to ignore all X content.

ceejayoz 9 hours ago | parent [-]

Which is just the "yet you participate in society" meme again.

bbg2401 3 hours ago | parent [-]

No, it's not. Don't be so intellectually lazy.

The author of the comment higher up is describing a person who is boycotting X because they are strongly against its stewardship and moderation but regardless continues to find ways to indulge themselves in the content produced by users of X, for other users of X.

How else should we describe the position held? It's clearly not entirely principled and veers directly into performative action (i.e. virtue signalling).

I admit I'm not nor have been a Twitter/X user so am able to look at the situation without a sense of entitlement or attachment.

ceejayoz an hour ago | parent [-]

> The author of the comment higher up is describing a person who is boycotting X because they are strongly against its stewardship and moderation but regardless continues to find ways to indulge themselves in the content produced by users of X, for other users of X.

Yes. Because we have to participate in a society in which sometimes, that's where the info is. Some towns only post their announcements on Facebook/X! Some people prominent on my framework of choice are only on X.

> How else should we describe the position held? It's clearly not entirely principled and veers directly into performative action (i.e. virtue signalling).

Virtue isn't a binary. I can reduce my externalities, even if I can't eliminate them.

cudder 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Not really, unfortunately. If it were just a bunch of bros laughing at fascist memes amongst themselves I would happily boycott everything, but unfortunately a lot of "public" service announcements and discourse also happens on 卐itter. Things like utility companies' and emergency services announcements, city council decisions, public transport notices, official statements by MEPs/local politicians/companies, etc. Not to mention a certain demented orange geriatric who happens to control nukes and posts his daily threats and declarations of war there.

These are all things I want to stay informed on, and given the choice would rather read elsewhere. Often I get the same information from secondary sources and manage to avoid that, but even then on controversial things I prefer to check the source directly.

asdff 2 hours ago | parent [-]

>Things like utility companies' and emergency services announcements

I am shocked you get this served via twitter instead of usual service notices for these things. I don't use twitter and I still get these notices and other news.

vrganj 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Why should we let one far right billionaire control how we interact with a large portion of the online space? Why shouldn't we try to exfiltrate the data from him instead of just letting him hoard it?

And regarding copyright, the same company owns an LLM that was no doubt trained through mass copyright infringement. Maybe the legal double standard is on their end?

simondotau 9 hours ago | parent [-]

> Why should we let one far right billionaire control how we interact

We don't. We let six or seven far right billionares do that.

> And regarding copyright

Copyright of tweets are owned by original authors. Unless you have permission, the copyright infringement which occurs is against the individual, not X.

xyst 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I don’t use Twitter but assholes continue to reference posts on this cancerous site. That’s why this service exists lil bro