| ▲ | gruez an hour ago | |
>I think it would be an inmensely naive and unnuanced take to look at this email and think that the truth is finally being revealed about CA. What was revealed that we didn't already know? >I'd suggest to look for more nuance instead of easy answers. Shouldn't you be looking for said answers and presenting them, instead of chastising me for not having the answers? | ||
| ▲ | andersonpico 12 minutes ago | parent [-] | |
> instead of chastising me Oh quit clutching your pearls, he was perfectly civil. You're the one trying to downplay things we know weren't at all covered in full by these emails (and we've known that for quite a long time). And know about them since you're downplaying them in other comments in this thread (things like exploring the quizz apps and how Facebook knew CA had exploited the API since 2015, how CA initially said the data was for academic purposes, etc). The latter part of your comment ("how far should we go, the invention of the printing press?") shows me you're not only crying about being corrected but being disingenuous to push a narrative based on lies. Since you're doubling down and running cover for Facebook/CA/Trump's campaign all over the thread it suggests there's more than plain stupidity and dishonesty as motives. | ||