We talked about them in my neighborhood mainly because of package theft. If I ever thought there was a real chance of enforcement action, I’d be in favor.

▲

NietzscheanNull 8 hours ago | parent [-]

You would rather infringe on the privacy of your community and invite a company known for indiscriminate multi-pronged dragnet surveillance (plates/faces/bluetooth beacons/etc.), with a nation-wide blanket coverage network that has already been provably abused by police on multiple occasions, all because of a handful of petty package theft cases?

Honestly, I'm at a loss for words.

	▲	y1n0 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Hell yes. The risk of abuse is absurdly small. I drive too even though there is a risk of death. The juice is worth the squeeze. Except even armed with positive identification, the police won’t do anything. Laws with enforcement are worth nothing. Stalking and whatever else has happened with the data is already illegal. But who gives a shit without enforcement.
	▲	chadgpt3 7 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		In other countries you only look at the footage if a crime actually happens, to see who did it