| ▲ | jacobgold 4 hours ago | |
Just like they're already doing with frontier-level open weight models? Do you imagine that Russian and Chinese intelligence don't have copies of the Mythos/Fable weights? The point is to slow progress of future models. Nothing can stop what has already been created. | ||
| ▲ | 0xDEAFBEAD an hour ago | parent [-] | |
With closed-weight, we can get the models out to defenders before they're in the hands of attackers. There are also other categories of risk such as biorisk. Open-weight means no guardrails. Don't get me wrong, I like your idea of deflating the AI bubble, I'm just skeptical that this is a great way to do it. The PauseAI people have some ideas: https://pauseai.info/proposal * International body which must approve new training runs * Ban training on copyrighted material * Hold AI model creators liable The essential benefit of your idea is making new training runs unprofitable. But I imagine there are other ways to accomplish that, e.g. by taxing AI companies to the point where they are just barely squeaking by financially. | ||