> and you will face criminal and financial penalties for damages caused.

I don't understand why this isn't talked about more.

We don't need a slowdown. Just double down on prosecuting crimes.

Let the companies take the risk. If they feel confident and they're right they win market share. If they don't feel confident, they can not risk it and slow down. If they feel confident and they get it wrong, they should be sued to kingdom come. That alone should disincentivize reckleses behavior like letting models run crazy with large amounts of compute which leads to them escaping sandboxes.

This performative "our internal modles are so crazy powerful" song and dance is getting old, especially with no real concrete explanations.

▲

jbeyer 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> just double down on prosecuting crimes.

That quote comes from someone that has never tried to get law enforcement to pursue a case. Local or state police are completely unequipped to respond. And FBI is unlikely to get involved unless damage is high six figures. We had an incident where we had a ton of evidence pointing to a past employee. It would have been an incredibly easy case for the FBI. They didn't have the resources to handle it. And this was a case that was gift-wrapped with a bow for them. Imagine a case where we didn't have evidence, or an idea of who it was ....

	▲	Chris2048 an hour ago \| parent \| next [-]
		> FBI is unlikely to get involved unless damage is high six figures How many figures of damage did Aaron Swartz cause?
	▲	AnimalMuppet 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		High six figures? I suspect there's going to be something well past that in the near future.

▲

deagle50 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Because they've done a great job in shifting the narrative to doomerism, from the very beginning. And money.