Eh. This entire tweet smacks of being AI generated. It has a huge amount of LLM-isms.

I wouldn't be surprised if Sacks just prompted an LLM to just come up with whatever rebuttal to whatever the regulation side comes up (given the big set of regulation tweets) with sounds most convincing, given his usual anti-regulation stance.

Anyone with a Pangram account who can check?

Pangram reports 100% AI generated

https://www.pangram.com/history/410ce80f-bd0e-45b6-a82c-d6ed...