| ▲ | agd 4 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Huge amount of skepticism on HN right now, but the models are increasingly capable, and there are real, significant risks. The approach proposed by Amodei looks sensible - voluntary checks at frontier labs, and appropriate regulation to follow. Yes, the devil's in the details, but it feels like the right approach overall. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | jacobgold 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
> The approach proposed by Amodei looks sensible... It's hard to imagine any government regulation that didn't look sensible on paper and at first. But we know that government regulation has an extremely mixed record, with lots of good and bad outcomes. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | laimewhisps 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
The largest risk is that Anthropic and OpenAI have a monopoly on the SOTA. This is why you see these companies trying so hard to get regulatory capture. For the rest of us, we want access as equitable as possible. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | vrganj 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Turns out the EU was right all along with the AI act. They've been adopting a well-deserved "told you so" stance lately: > "In my view, the EU has already legislated for exactly this scenario: it is called the AI Act," said Michael McNamara, an Irish European Parliament lawmaker, who's the co-lead of the Parliament's group monitoring AI. https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-response-ai-extinction-wa... | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||