YC funds companies and we are all aware of that so by saying it's a YC company because they gave them seed money is already exactly the correct wording

▲

card_zero an hour ago | parent | next [-]

How about the "it’s them" part?

▲

HNhelpsFlock 41 minutes ago | parent [-]

[flagged]

▲

josfredo 31 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Holy conspiracy theorists. I surely was not expecting this amount of paranoia from a sound place like HN. Either way, drama is always welcome, for it is ultimately unavoidable, in one form or another.

▲

card_zero 37 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

I just don't like moral distortions. Is YC in control of Flock or responsible for their choices? Who are "them", what are we ignorant about and why is it Marxism?

▲

HNhelpsFlock 33 minutes ago | parent [-]

> Who are “them”

YC (you want me to name the partners here? Or Flock’s YC advisors?)

> Marxism

Can someone please downvote this fool since it was never said

> I don’t like moral distortions

No you love them

▲

card_zero 29 minutes ago | parent [-]

But what are you saying? YC are to blame for the unsavory future directions of the companies they fund. Counterargument, no they're not, what are you banging on about.

	▲	WarmWash 9 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Classic ideologue behavior of no-nuance blind rage to stoke as much support as possible for their cause. "My cause is more important than honesty, and honesty could detract from the rage energy I need" You see this is everywhere, and it (lack of rational discussion/reasoning) is soooo incredibly destructive to society. We can stop Flock without having to make up lies. They do enough bad stuff that their is no need for deceit and conspiracy...

▲

b112 31 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

No, no it isn't.