Especially when chances are that this camera installation was the result of local government asking and paying Flock to put it up. I'm not sure why the anger is directed at the company instead of local elected officials, and I understand the plight of the installer who's worried about being labeled as a bad guy for executing public works contracts.

> I understand the plight of the installer who's worried about being labeled as a bad guy for executing public works contracts.

You do unpopular things, you gotta expect to be an unpopular person.

Sophisticated, educated types might understand that parking wardens are just doing their jobs, and they didn't make the policy they're enforcing. But to 70% of the population, the person putting a ticket on their car is an asshole.

Well, politicians are to pay for the fact they have allowed something like Flock cameras to be put up and spy to egregiously on their constituents.

But Flock itself should not be spared . They are building things that are going against widely accepted values.

Since when Americans are okay with that level of erosion of their privacy?

Same thing with Meta building pervert glasses.

The company could have rejected the government deal if they cared about the moral aspect of spying on citizens instead of money; by accepting the deal and executing the contract they are complicit.