I don't disagree with you here. But what does "broken" mean? What is "cheating", and is it ever allowed? And maybe you are not only going through your existing training data, but generate training data specifically to make clear to the model that .... what exactly?

If you don't know how persistence and morality interact, and you don't have a theory in place for this, I don't have confidence you can properly supervise the training data. Which is how we arrived at the current situation.