Nevermind, I have no idea honestly.

Not just on prediction but in parts also based on just not wanting certain risks. We can and do deem some things inherently risky, up to the point of banning them even.

Why wasn't it airgapped, for example? How was the action not allowed? Or do you mean in some weak sense, not in a hard not possible? RL systems doing weird and expected things wouldn't exactly be new, no?

We police people working with all sorts of dangerous things, if we think AI dangerous why not do that here, too? We don't just leave things up to people on the ground or companies.

Edit: I think the post I replied to changed a bit - nevermind. A complex topic.

	▲	2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		[deleted]
	▲	itsalwaysgood an hour ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		I read more about the incident, and was offering up way too much opinion not grounded in 'fact' (barring philosphical evidence). It's a complex topic for sure. I stand by my opinions about frontier work, pushing thr edge, and connecting ideas. But I have no idea, and haven't given much thought to what it means to enforce regulation that would also slow the forward advancement of technology, the economy, etc.
	▲	cindyllm 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		[dead]