| ▲ | mikae1 3 hours ago | |
Thank you for Linux Homebrew! It works so damn well. For me the distro package manager is for system packages, Homebrew and Flatpak for the user facing apps. | ||
| ▲ | curt15 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Where do you draw the line between system packages and user facing apps? Some software defies such an easy categorization. If your default install doesn't come with docker and you install docker later for development, does that make docker a user-facing app? What about language toolchains like golang, rust, npm, etc? | ||
| ▲ | LeBit 13 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
On Linux I use mise to install CLI tools | ||
| ▲ | 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
| [deleted] | ||
| ▲ | shevy-java 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
I don't understand the distinction you use here. Then again I use versioned AppDirs on Linux since +20 years anyway, so I am not really into any arbitrary disctinction random linux distributions try to push down onto the (downstream) userbase. Besides, if you compile from source, why would you want to rely on the distribution package manager to begin with? None of them allow for versioned AppDirs by default as far as I know; NixOS uses a hashed name, so that is the only exception I can think of (and GoboLinux of course), but as far as I know if you are on e. g. a debian system, you can not use it for a versioned AppDir layout. | ||