| ▲ | baxtr 7 hours ago |
| What if OAI/Anthropic encouraged the agents to behave like that in order to push for regulation? |
|
| ▲ | dv_dt 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Regulation as a barrier to competition catching up to them, as well as submarine marketing for both offensive and defensive uses of ai |
|
| ▲ | teiferer 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| "But sir, I only committed the murder to push for stronger criminal laws!" Terrible defense. |
| |
| ▲ | daemin 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It is a very rare occurrence when corporations and the people running them are punished for killing people. I mean the whole concept of a corporation was created to shield the owners of it from being liable for damages caused by / visited upon the enterprise. | | |
| ▲ | nxobject 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | That’s a good reminder of a company that might have a very familiar ethos: Pacific Gas & Electric. Criminally convicted of 64 counts of involuntary manslaughter after towns were destroyed by wildfire. But oh well, what are we gonna do with a limited liability enterprise? At this point their liability insurance covers all the financial penalties they’ll need to spend. |
| |
| ▲ | fer 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | More like: "look what happens with my useful product, we need to regulate it to artificially extend our ever shrinking moat" |
|
