Yeah, AI may suck - time will tell.

But focusing on bioweapons and mass destruction, on the grief other people (‘jailed minorities’) cause, disregards the progress we have made. Over centuries human welfare has massively increased. On average things have never been better for humanity.

I’m not saying there’s no danger of bad things happening - I’m saying our view is distorted, which is a not a good basis for decision making

▲

Fordec 7 hours ago | parent [-]

And I'm no bear on the tech either. I'm not even in the boat of that the tech should be slowed down yet. But in a world where anyone can produce the effort of 300 people trivially, this eventually takes us places. Electricity and industrialization introduced huge benefits upfront, it introduced new problems that needed addressing at the long tail. Lets not pretend there won't be new problems to tackle here or just "hope" it works out.

AI isn't going to create in of itself "new" problems, it's just going to expose what we already know can cause harm, but was just stopped from being bigger problems because scaling issues was a natural barrier and we took the lazy way out until now.

	▲	catoc 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Yes AI may cause job loss, more inequality in the short term. But if there is anything humanity has shown is that we can deal with disruptive progress. We may need to resettle but over the longer term every disruptive innovation so far has lead to an increase in wellbeing for the whole of humanity. (That does not resolve the danger of AI itself ‘going rogue’ or a single lunatic developing a bioweapon, but those things are much less likely to occur than the level of media attention would suggest.)