| ▲ | ricardobeat 3 hours ago |
| Your mistake is assuming “people” wrote this. |
|
| ▲ | dofm 2 hours ago | parent [-] |
| I mean, people didn't write the text, but people did decide it was what they wanted it to say? I don't really get it. But then I think text-to-CAD is probably the strongest example of cart-before-horse thinking in the AI world as regards technical work compared to creative work. |
| |
| ▲ | fwip 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Who knows what the author wanted. "Write an well researched article comparing two approaches to 3d modeling with AI. Make no mistakes." | | |
| ▲ | dofm 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | The author is working on a text-to-CAD app. I would hope they were a bit further along with understanding CAD in order to make AI automate it? (Am I naïve? … Oh god, I'm naïve) | | |
| ▲ | knollimar 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I'm trying to teach a subordinate to draft and he keeps saying "this feels automatable" before he undedstands how to do it. I had to explicitly tell him "do not try to automate [particular task] before you know how to do it. He has not successfully finished said task once, and I caught him working on it on Friday... | |
| ▲ | fwip 31 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | You could totally be right - but for me, the problem of AI writing is that it's really hard to know how much work the original author put into it, or their level of understanding. |
|
|
|
