| ▲ | 3eb7988a1663 3 hours ago | |||||||
I have also wondered about the possibility of media emitting some kind of hidden identifier. Can normal speakers emit noise outside of human hearing that could contain a unique id? Would not even need to be a lot of data that could be broadcast. | ||||||||
| ▲ | fc417fc802 40 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Yes, it's possible. Some sports broadcasts do this. The ones I'm familiar with use a high pitched tone on the edge of human hearing but still audible to most people. Streaming services watermark the video as opposed to the audio as I understand it. But that's for tracing pirated content back to the originating user account. It's not particularly useful (also entirely unnecessary and overly complicated) if your goal is to ID a piece of content as opposed to an account. | ||||||||
| ▲ | corysama 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
That's not necessary. If a service has access to the raw audio of a show, it can fingerprint each second of that audio in a way that can be matched in a tiny amount of computation even for a recording in a noisy environment. That can't recognize what you say. But, it can ID where you are in a specific show out of zillions of hours of shows. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | gharper an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Honestly, it doesn’t even need to be outside the range of human hearing. A quick search for “audio steganography” should answer your question (and be a fun rabbit hole if you find that sort of topic interesting) | ||||||||