This is America though. The mere presense of a gun shouldn't involve calling the cops unless there is a bigger reason to expect something nefarious. US cops being thugs and aggressive is a known fact so I find it hard to say Waymo isn't part of the problem, they have the best view of the situation after all and are initiating the call/report of armed criminals.

▲

willsmith72 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

> The mere presense of a gun shouldn't involve calling the cops

Unless it's against the terms of service of the private corporation

▲

valleyer 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

At least in the US, police don't enforce terms of service of private corporations. That's a civil matter, enforced by filing a lawsuit.

▲

AngryData 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

If that was truly the only issue then it is a civil matter and the cops have no jurisdiction without a ruling from a judge. If I walk into a store with no shoes despite them requiring shoes, the first action isn't call the police and have the person arrested without saying anything.

	▲	ryandrake 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		Exactly. If Waymo wants to be weird and disallow people from legally or even illegally open carrying, then that should be between the customer and Waymo. They should not get to call the police.

▲

LorenPechtel 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

The mere presence, no. The gun in the holster, fine. The gun in your hand, not so fine.