If you stop going "nobody will do anything actually effective", and start going "how do we do something actually successful", any number of successful ideas start readily arising. It is possible to stop. Not easy, but possible.

▲

koolala a day ago | parent [-]

Like a war or something? I can't think of a successful non-bad way for everyone to stop besides a treaty.

▲

malfist a day ago | parent [-]

Outside of the current nonsense in Iran, we've never had to go to war to prevent nuclear arms. We've never had to go to war to ban weapons in space. These things are possible. Hard but possible

	▲	JumpCrisscross a day ago \| parent \| next [-]
		> we've never had to go to war to prevent nuclear arms. We've never had to go to war to ban weapons in space We've mostly been blindsided by covert nuclear programmes. As for weapons in space, they don't have any purpose. The moment they make sense we'll see weapons in space.
	▲	koolala a day ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		That's why treaties sound reasonable to me. Though I'd imagine they would be more like Climate Change ones. Before Iran there were bombings to stop nuclear arms. Imagine a country getting bombed because it's detected their building a data center.