| ▲ | liquid_thyme 3 hours ago |
| I've been using the 'ClearURLs' FF addon for quite a while now, and it gives you the URLs back in the results. https://docs.clearurls.xyz/ |
|
| ▲ | joeblubaugh 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| That wouldn’t work at all with this url format - the url can only be resolved by requesting the goto link. I recommend reading more than the headline |
| |
| ▲ | Dylan16807 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | > That wouldn’t work at all with this url format - the url can only be resolved by requesting the goto link. What is "that" you say wouldn't work? The extension can work fine by requesting every goto link upfront. As far as your google searches go, this is just as private as before. I would recommend you avoid judging a comment because of a metric it neither said nor implied. | | |
| ▲ | hurfdurf 7 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Previously the clear target URL of a search result was added to the result-link (or div?) as an additional data-tag (aria or whatever, can't remember), and thus was able to be used with a userscript or similar to replace the Googleified tracking redirect link. And it was also part of the googliefied tracking URL, either way you were able to see the clear target URL. That no longer is possible, you must ask google.com for consent to visit the result link before seeing what the final target URL is. |
| |
| ▲ | 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
|
| ▲ | josephcsible 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The reason this change is so bad is that it encrypts the actual URL, specifically to break addons like that. |
|
| ▲ | II2II 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I decided to verify the article's claims, forgetting that I had ClearURLs installed, and ClearURLs does not handle this new format. The article also suggests that it cannot be decoded. |