Dance is such a nuanced thing. Really I think it is more like a language than anything else.

When I think about dance, it's about the algebraic structure in it. E.g. translating moves between different levels, transitions between moves, and so on. That, and the movement options that increased physical capabilities unlock. So nothing like what OP thinks about. Not a criticism of what they've written; just a different perspective.

I found quite interesting the apps the author created for dancing: https://vester.si/blog/dance-tools/

However I could not figure out which partner dances he focuses on, I would be curious to know.

>Learning styles aren't a thing*. It was an idea popularized many years ago - that some people learn by seeing, some by hearing, others by thinking about things , etc... - and has been so thorougly proven not to replicate that when teachers use it to promote their methodology I practice my breathing exercises to not let it get to me.

What???