| ▲ | GloriousKoji an hour ago | |
That's part of the problem. "May contain" doesn't provide legal protection and then if you make it a standard there needs to be testing for compliance which ends up as the same original problem and you just add compliance tits to your food product. | ||
| ▲ | Dylan16807 7 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
> "May contain" doesn't provide legal protection Yes, this causes problems. > and then if you make it a standard there needs to be testing for compliance Why would there need to be any additional testing? If anything I'd expect "may" foods to need less testing than an accident-prone "no" food. | ||
| ▲ | Zak an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |
"May contain" should provide legal protection. It may be compliance tits in some cases, but that's better than forcing the addition of a compliance ingredient. | ||