| ▲ | JoshTriplett a day ago | |
Limiting the flood wouldn't mean necessarily omitting stories like "new model released" (within reason); it'd mean omitting "check out my new vibecoded slop" or "check out this article that's obviously LLM-written and provides very little value" (what we once would have called "blogspam", or dismissed as SEO-bait). | ||
| ▲ | skeledrew a day ago | parent | next [-] | |
There's no way to reliably filter that "vibecoded slop" or "low value LLM-written article" (BTW what about low value human-written articles?) without users actually interacting with them. And it's actually the votes/flags of said users that determines visibility, so I'd say that's an indication of where the interests of HN's most active users lie. | ||
| ▲ | pixl97 a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Anyone with any karma can limit the flood by upvoting/down voting. And based on the number of dead submissions they do. I think part of the problem is people that like AI really like it and those that hate it really hate it. Hard to reconcile that. | ||