| ▲ | US diesel hits record $6 a gallon on Iran supply shock(ft.com) |
| 38 points by mraniki 2 hours ago | 53 comments |
| |
|
| ▲ | OgsyedIE an hour ago | parent | next [-] |
| Also driving the price up are the Ansarallah advances in Yemen and today's Ansarallah bombings of the Saudi East-West pipeline. The market expects that they'll use military force to attempt to close the Bab al-Mandab strait, with their past attempts at closing the strait, stated goals of closing the strait and newly reported use of Claude to develop medium-range ballistic missile guidance software as evidence. |
| |
| ▲ | riffraff 37 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Also Related: Saudi Arabia’s crude output falls to lowest level since 1990
https://finance.yahoo.com/energy/articles/saudi-arabia-crude... | |
| ▲ | larodi 37 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Would be surprising if they don't in fact. In fact it is perhaps quite straightforward to skip Claude and rather tell Qwen 3.8 27b to create an angry birds clone where you track the bird... or something along the line. Pretty sure they are also very good at smuggling various assets through borders, and where not. |
|
|
| ▲ | comrade1234 22 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Yesterday I saw a full-sized 100% electric Volvo semi-truck here in Zurich. It was owned by Aldi and making a delivery to one of their stores. It was a bit louder than I expected but nevertheless impressive. https://www.aldi-suisse.ch/de/ueber-aldi-suisse/unternehmen/... |
| |
| ▲ | jonny2811 18 minutes ago | parent [-] | | "Der Volvo-Lastwagen, der für ein Gesamtgewicht von 42 Tonnen zugelassen ist und eine Reichweite von bis zu 320 Kilometern hat" 320km doesn't seem like a long distance for a truck, curious how that works in practice | | |
| ▲ | _djo_ 12 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | It's optimised for distance to and from the depot and in-city store locations. Presumably it charges at the depot while loading. Trucks have a lot more space for batteries, so with EV trucks it's all about balancing range and weight for the task. More range means less useful load. | |
| ▲ | stavros 15 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | 320km seems like a very long distance to go without a rest stop. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | zhivota 9 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I'd say this should push Americans towards smaller, more fuel efficient cars and EVs, but I know better. The American consumer seems immune to price pressure. |
|
| ▲ | jaapz 18 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| 6 dollars per gallon is 1.37 EUR per liter... Here I am in the netherlands paying 2.74 EUR for a liter of diesel... |
| |
|
| ▲ | amelius 25 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| But no worries, we'll soon get $5,000 from the US government and this will allow us to buy plenty of gas. |
| |
| ▲ | kotaKat 24 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Don't forget the $5000 DOGE dividend, the $2000 tariff refunds, the $500 Obamacare refunds, and the thousands+ in Trump Accounts! (But $10k in student loan relief? That's Socialist!) | | |
| ▲ | mcv 22 minutes ago | parent [-] | | If all of that is possible, why not just provide a reliable basic income? Why does it need to feel like a politician is bribing you for your vote? |
|
|
|
| ▲ | beloch 14 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| "War is merely the continuation of policy by other means." "Since war is not an act of senseless passion but is controlled by its political object, the value of this object must determine the sacrifices to be made for it in magnitude and also in duration. Once the expenditure of effort exceeds the value of the political object, the object must be renounced and peace must follow." ---------- Clausewitz would have been flabbergasted by this war. If we're being overly generous to Trump, we might call it an act of senseless passion. The reality is probably worse. The U.S. still hasn't seemed to figure out what it's policy goals or winning conditions are, aside from the president's desire to be an all-powerful winner. Trump seemingly places no value on his nation's blood or treasure, so it might be a very long time before he begins to feel the effort his nation is expending isn't worth the value of his own vanity. The U.S. needs to have its magna carta moment and reign in its mad king. Maybe that will come with the mid-terms, or maybe this war will drag on for two more years. Trump isn't going to stop it, now or after the mid-terms. As far as he's concerned, the pain isn't his. |
|
| ▲ | larodi 37 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Almost nearing the price in Europe. So still early to complain. |
| |
| ▲ | LoganDark 33 minutes ago | parent [-] | | This reminds me of when people were calling the UK a bunch of wimps for complaining about record high heat of like 80F, just because Americans have been dealing with 100F or more for years (over 100 years in some cases). So what that prices in Europe have already been higher? Prices in America haven't been, so it's a shock to them. | | |
| ▲ | roryirvine 21 minutes ago | parent [-] | | More of a shock, if anything - the higher taxes in Europe act to damp price swings, so sudden rises like this hit America proportionately more. | | |
| ▲ | LoganDark 9 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I heard that a relative lack of air conditioners in the UK made the higher temperatures hit them proportionally more than the US too. In both cases my point is that of course it's shocking to suddenly hit circumstances you're unprepared for. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | bigcheeto 15 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I bet they post record profits |
|
| ▲ | 22 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | swarnie an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Let's get this to $7 next. The people need to learn. |
| |
| ▲ | epolanski 18 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Which people? Because the responsibility lies in the founding fathers thinking that electing kings with little to no checks was a good idea. |
|
|
| ▲ | juliusceasar an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The whole world is suffering because of this 2nd Epstein War.
Current administration being blackmailed by Israel. |
| |
| ▲ | Kelteseth an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Only the countries that have not yet transitioned to clean energy | | |
| ▲ | cjrp an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | And countries that import goods. If you supply chain needs diesel, you're going to be paying more. | | |
| ▲ | Kelteseth an hour ago | parent [-] | | In Germany wie have had a great influx of electric trucks in the last year |
| |
| ▲ | LunaSea an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | That's basically all countries | |
| ▲ | XorNot an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | That's all of them. | | |
| ▲ | vrganj an hour ago | parent [-] | | Maybe this war will change that? | | |
| ▲ | toasty228 an hour ago | parent [-] | | Unless you're ready to give up on a lot of convenience this is just not happening. | | |
| ▲ | vrganj 41 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Hmm, I think for me personally the only thing I'd need to change is the heating in my apartment and I'm already planning to invest in a heat pump. | | |
| ▲ | lazyasciiart 15 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | For you personally, I'm guessing your lifestyle depends very heavily on everyone in the apartments and buildings around you, and the grocery stores that supply you, and the roads that they move goods over, and the materials they manufacture in order to distribute power and water and collect sewage....so unless all of them have transitioned, I think you're overestimating your resilience to the loss of fossil fuels. | |
| ▲ | xienze 16 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yes, the things that affect your lifestyle w.r.t. oil are contained to just you and your apartment. | | |
| ▲ | vrganj 9 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Instead of a sarcastic swipe, you could try making an actual argument and tell me how I would personally be affected. |
|
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | toasty228 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | There is no clean energy, we don't know how to build any of the "clean energy" harvestors without using massive amount of fossil fuel. | | |
| |
| ▲ | lotsofpulp an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | I thought reduced fossil fuel usage benefits the world. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | expedition32 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It's quite funny how Trump is killing European industry. Literally everything America has been doing the last few years has benefited China. The Chinese economy has real weaknesses make no mistake about it and a competent US leader could have worked with his global allies to exploit them. |
| |
| ▲ | cpursley 24 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | They started that path to economic suicide by deciding they don't want cheap gas as well as shutting down reactors. Well, depending on your geopolitical beliefs, entire situation was possibility coordinated to get Europe on American LNG and off the stuff piped from Rusland and the Middle East. This was all in play well before Orange Man, but wow did he push the gas pedal down and accelerate it (pun intended). BTW there's only one way out of it, but many Europeans aren't going to like the medicine nor the global primacy people running the USA. | | | |
| ▲ | epolanski 15 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | As an European, trust me, Trump has little to do with it. We've been doing fine championing our nationalism instead of creating a strong internal market. Because Hungarians decide in Hungary and Spaniards in Spain doing business across Europe is still very tough. And it doesn't help our train economies are all export economies, which is a broken model for quite some time (yet trump seems to not see it). |
|
|
| ▲ | DarmokTanagra 32 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [dead] |
|
| ▲ | spiclk 35 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] |
| The "just stop oil" folks must be delighted with the direction of things in the middle east. |
| |
| ▲ | theplumber 19 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | I think it just proves them right. China seems to be doing OK partly due renewables push. But what do I know, electrification is a Chinese hoax. | | |
| ▲ | ZeroGravitas 4 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Trump explicitly claimed that China sells wind turbines to other countries but doesn't use them for their own needs. That is of course a stupid lie. But it's amazing how many smart liars say something similar to "China controls 70℅ of the global wind market" without clarifying that they install nearly all of that in China because they installed 73% of new wind capacity in 2025. |
| |
| ▲ | mcv 21 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I would prefer to stop the demand rather than the supply. The high prices encourage production elsewhere. | |
| ▲ | cpursley 27 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | But how will they protest if they can't drive and meet up or fly to those green events? | | |
|
