| ▲ | manofmanysmiles 3 hours ago | |
> OpenAI would have no incentive to taint its first math announcement of this magnitude if it knew it were "plagiarizing" another person's work. I'm not sure I follow, considering the waterfall of evidence of unethical behavior flowing from OpenAI. A few major ones: - Safety team departures and dissolution in 2023 and 2024 - Mass copyright infrigement lawsuits - Scarlett Johansson Voice Controversy - For-Profit Conversion and Broken Promises - AI Agents Acting Autonomously - Potential Theft of User Work (this current controversy) - Military contracts These are not evidence of incentives, but rather evidence that ethetics seem to be of little concern to the company as a whole. Incentive wise, I would look at the perceive existential position due to competitors, capex, IPO pressure etc. | ||
| ▲ | 20k an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |
Especially after they committed textbook misconduct by trying to purge one of the paper authors because he worked for a competitor | ||
| ▲ | symfoniq an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Ye shall know them by their fruits. | ||