| ▲ | btown 5 hours ago | |
Heck, it’s even astonishing that any sort of generalized computer program could even verify a proof of this magnitude that hasn’t already been codified in a formal verification language. If, and it’s unclear that we’ll ever get the full story, they did draw inspiration from training on (or even directly accessing) rough notes that had been provided by another researcher in prose… the fact that it could leap so rapidly to a full formal verifiable Lean program for the entire scope of the problem is an incredible result in its own right. | ||
| ▲ | iterance 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Then, of course, one must verify that the verification code is valid, or the purpose of verification is more or less moot. | ||
| ▲ | 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
| [deleted] | ||