not sure why you're getting downvoted. but if you're building even very popular applications, it is quite easy to see how LLMs are very well suited for this type of consistency job.

- they follow instructions quite well.

- are tireless at doing mechanical ports between languages and frameworks.

- Can understand a new ecosystem quite well.

▲

nemomarx 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Then why aren't people doing that? Microsoft has as much access to cheap tokens as any software company around, right, so you'd think they would be leading the way.

	▲	suriyaG 4 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I'm sure these things are in the plans from upper management. we'll know when the next layoffs hit.
	▲	chasd00 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		they probably are but have some patience. Keep in mind, claudecode and the other coding agents were pretty bad until around Jan of this year (2026). So it's only been about 9 months since devs have had decent coding agents and even less time has elapsed since somewhat wide adoption.

▲

collingreen 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I didn't downvote but I'd expect downvotes for a completely unnuanced thought terminating cliche that ignores everything in the thread. AI fanaticism doesn't help but lots of people don't get downvoted for that alone.