| ▲ | zrail an hour ago | |||||||
I haven't tried it personally but my understanding from friends is that Pangram is very accurate, at least for now. | ||||||||
| ▲ | _joel an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Ironic that site looks like it's AI generated too | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | walrus01 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
As a paid service it probably works great. In the spirit of weaponizing vibecoded slop vs vibecoded slop, I'm fairly sure that I could 'teach' locally hosted Qwen 3.8-Flash-Next to identify vibe coded slop, with a thorough enough system prompt and access to like, playwright and headless chromium. Or since a lot of vibe coded static sites are just plain html, cs, js, a first try attempt via wget to mirror the first 500KB of the site and then analyze it. | ||||||||