OpenAI might have stolen another major proof

If we put aside the idea of credit for a moment, it sounds like human/AI collaboration is indeed super charging discovery.

▲

Legend2440 27 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This is a really weak claim. The evidence they offer is just "someone somewhere says they had a discussion with AI about the topic at some point".

They don't even claim to have had a proof, only to have been working on it.

	▲	rnijveld 18 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		I would say there is a significant difference between AI discovering this completely on its own versus AI creating the finishing connecting part by connecting relevant data. Maybe this claim is too strong, but if part of it is true then the claims that OpenAI have made would be too strong as well. To me it would feel more like how LLMs seem to work for me personally: incapable of unique work, but very capable of capturing large amounts of data and connecting the dots.

▲

1337h4xx 23 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

TL/DR: Mathematician opted out of training on 29-JUN and asked OpenAI whether they trained on his data and was told that it "did not happen" but it clearly did.