| ▲ | imglorp 17 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
Then VAX would have been an option, especially since there were migration tools from PDP. And VAXen cluster for scaling. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | p_l 6 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
There were options for migrating from PDP-11, not PDP-10. PDP-11 was a 16bit byte-addressable minicomputer that was extended to 22 bit physical addresses through MMU. VAX took PDP-11 and extended it into 32bit flat addressable paged system. PDP-10 was 36-bit, word-addressed with 18bit addressing (plus segment extensions in KL-B that were only really implemented in 3rd party follow-ons, a mainframe-in-all-but-name. VAX would mean starting from zero unless nearly everything was written very high-level, which is doubtful given the optimizations needed to run so many simultaneous users. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||