Remix.run Logo
ssl-3 2 hours ago

I can understand people just fine with the voice profiles provided by Bluetooth. Strictly speaking, I don't need anything better than that.

But it sure is nice to be able to make phone calls where people don't sound worse than they did with digitally-switched analog landline telephones in 1995. Bluetooth doesn't get there at all.

The losses of Bluetooth even compound generationally: The inescapable tin-can audio of Bluetooth at one end first gets transmogrified by at least one intermediate lossy codec for transmission across/betwixt the network(s), and then gets tin-canned harder when the far end of the connection is also using Bluetooth.

For perspective: 1995's phone calls were ultimately limited by the G.711 codec, which itself dates to 1972. I'm not setting the bar very high here at all.

echoangle an hour ago | parent [-]

Calls on AirPods don’t sound worse to me than on the phone speakers, I don’t think the AirPods noticeably decrease the quality compared to the stuff happening on the phone network.

zamadatix 13 minutes ago | parent [-]

"The phone network" is already 16 kHz AMR-WB (or worse, 8 kHz AMR-NB depending who you're calling). I think people here are discussing Teams/Slack/Zoom/FaceTime/Discord/WhatsApp/etc type calls where there is actually a snowball's chance in hell of receiving something which can compete with a tape recorder in the first place.