| ▲ | TulliusCicero 4 hours ago |
| But it's not really the same aspect ratio, is it? Because one is used predominantly vertically, and the other horizontally. As long as there's this landscape vs portrait difference, how does the aspect ratio similarity actually help? |
|
| ▲ | tiltowait 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| If you unfold and have two apps side-by-side, then the aspect ratio (and seemingly size?) is the same as having one app, closed. Seems nice to have. |
| |
| ▲ | leni536 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | That doesn't require a special aspect ratio. | |
| ▲ | TulliusCicero 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I mean that's true for side-by-side foldables in general isn't it? It doesn't require what Apple is saying about the aspect ratio here. |
|
|
| ▲ | wittjeff 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I want to be able to open the phone and get the original closed-state image, but stretched to fit the new total hardware viewport size. |
| |
| ▲ | nonethewiser 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | You mean unlike all of the marketing photos? | | |
| ▲ | wittjeff 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yes, that's what I mean. I didn't see the desired mode in any of the marketing materials. This mode would be an effective 1.4x full-screen scaling. To be more specific: if the OS desktop has XxY virtual pixels in closed mode, if the user opens it and rotates 90 degrees, the desktop still has XxY virtual pixels. No new usable real estate. Everything previously seen just gets a bit bigger. I don't expect it to be the desired default for most people, but I have middle-aged eyes. |
| |
| ▲ | 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|