| ▲ | professoretc 5 hours ago |
| If you want to know what flying first-class 50 years ago was like (and you live in southern California, and you have money to burn) you can try the Panam Experience (https://panamexperience.com/). It's a replica of a Panam 747, together with a "crew" in period-correct costumes, that tries to recreate the entire experience of flying in the 1950s. (Bearing in mind that the plane is a replica, located on a soundstage.) |
|
| ▲ | SoftTalker 4 hours ago | parent [-] |
| That sounds a bit weird, the 747 didn't enter commercial service until 1970. A 1950s flight experience would have been on something with piston engines and propellors, like a DC-6 or a Super Constellation. Noisy, turbulent, and not particularly safe by modern standards. |
| |
| ▲ | WalterBright 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I flew in piston airliners long ago. They fly low and slow, and barf bags are supplied for a reason (low altitude means lots of turbulence). Today's airliners fly high where the air is smooth, they've gotten very good at avoiding turbulent weather, and there are automated damping systems. The barf bags are still there, but I've never seen anyone use one. The cool thing about piston airliners, though, is the the engine start. | | |
| ▲ | SoftTalker 44 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I have flown in turboprops, which start just like a jet engine. Yes I bet the startup of a big Pratt & Whitney Twin Wasp or Wright Cyclone, belching smoke and fire would have been something to see. |
| |
| ▲ | OroPla 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | That's because the 1950s were seventy years ago, not fifty, which only brings you back to the 1970s. | | |
| ▲ | SoftTalker an hour ago | parent [-] | | Ah, I responded to "tries to recreate the entire experience of flying in the 1950s" and not the "50 years ago" yes in the 1970s it could certainly have been a 747. |
|
|