| ▲ | GoToRO 12 hours ago | |
"You are right, that was a red light!" At first I was skeptical, but reading the article, they do track object across video frames which for me it's the minimum a system like this should do. All previous FSD systems are just Fake self-driving. "That proprietary AI driver identifies features in images and point clouds, groups them into objects, and tracks them across frames, time-stamped to the millisecond to account for differing frame rates. The AI thus builds confidence over time, acting on object detections that persist across several frames, rather than, say, slamming the brakes due to a camera blip on a single frame." | ||
| ▲ | Onavo 33 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
> The AI thus builds confidence over time, acting on object detections that persist across several frames, rather than, say, slamming the brakes due to a camera blip on a single frame. Nice in theory but in practice they still need a ton of training data. The bitter lesson is very bitter. Tesla's end to end FSD uses occupancy networks and brake stabbing still hasn't been fully solved. | ||
| ▲ | SecretDreams an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |
> slamming the brakes due to a camera blip on a single frame Ironically, I'm sure most humans have done the eyeball equivalent a handful of times, despite our knowledge of object permeance. | ||